By lay preacher, Will Harron Awake, O my God, decree justice; let the assembly of the peoples gather round you. Good morning, saints! I’ve been asked to give a teaching sermon this morning on church governance, and the gospel reading for our feast of Saint James gives such a touching entry to this issue. Because this reading is, in its own way, also about church governance. Governance and politics are very nearly dirty words in our society, especially when combined with “church.” And there’s very real and compelling reasons why this has become the case: The corruption that power, money, and human immiseration have wrought on our systems of government and governance, the way that “politics” has become a synonym for fecklessness, partisanship, and deadlock, and the way that systems and structures of power have become pathways of abuse. And so, what, is church governance? James and John’s mother is asking this exact question. Let’s think about this text, what’s going on in the moment. This mother knows her sons have been following this teacher, this potential king and deliverer, for some time, and giving up all they owned, all of the systems and relationship with power that they had previously been enmeshed in, to do so. She has an idea of what Jesus’s kingdom will mean - a new world where the Roman oppression has been overthrown, replaced by a power structure where Jesus will be at the top. She has faith that this will be an effect with cosmic ramifications. And she know the worth of her sons. So she goes to Jesus and asks that they be given positions of honor in this new kingdom. Thanks, mom! Jesus deflects this request - as he told the disciples in the preceding passage, he is travelling to Jerusalem to face death. The honor of being at Jesus’s right and left is one fraught with danger rather than being heir to power. And this scene immediately provokes an uproar among the other 10 disciples. Why should James and John be at Jesus’s right and left? Why not Peter and Andrew, or Thomas and Matthew? Why disrupt the magnificent equality of the 12? And so Jesus again steps in, repeating and underscoring the message that the first will be last and the last will be first. This time, he expresses it as, “whoever wishes to be great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be your slave,” contrasting this to the worldly rulers who lord it over each other in extreme hierarchies. The kingdom that Jesus proclaims will be led from below, empowered by service, and following the witness and example of one who faced and overcame death itself to bring liberation. How does our own church governance relate to this witness and example? In the 18th chapter of Matthew, Jesus says that when two are three are gathered in his name, he is with them. I like to borrow that phrasing to say that when two or three people are gathered, for any decision, politics ensues. Because what politics is, at the root, is people engaged in group dynamics around how to distribute power. And so rather than a dirty word, for me politics and governance are expressions of how an institution composed of tens, hundreds, thousands, and millions, of people organizes itself. And while we don’t need to be focused on governance at all times to the exclusion of other ministries, we are all called to take up roles in the organization of our church. On page 855 of the Book of Common Prayer, in the Catechism, the ministry of the laity – people not ordained to the diaconal, priestly, or episcopal ministry, is defined as: to represent Christ and his Church; to bear witness to him wherever they may be; and, according to the gifts given them, to carry on Christ's work of reconciliation in the world; and to take their place in the life, worship, and governance of the Church. So church governance is, in its own ways, all of our work. How does this work in our Episcopal Church? For one thing, the Episcopal Church has some explicit hierarchies. We have bishops - it’s in the name, it’s what Episcopal means. Bishops serve as the chief priest and pastor of their diocese, and they act as the CEO of the legal corporation of the diocese. Our diocese, Western Massachusetts, is one of one hundred and eight dioceses in the Episcopal Church. Each diocese has a bishop, called the ordinary, or the bishop diocesan. Some of the larger dioceses have additional bishops - with titles such as suffragan, assistant, or co-adjutor, but the bishop diocesan is the top of the organizational chart of the diocese. Each bishop serves in the churchwide House of Bishops, which meets several times per year, and many bishops also serve on various churchwide bodies. But the Episcopal Church is not all about bishops! Bishops are elected by priests and by lay people - generally, each parish or church in a diocese is entitled to send representatives to the Diocesan Convention, an annual event where elections happen, budgets are passed, and the membership of the diocese can weigh in on the various issues facing the church. Bishops are elected at special meetings of Diocesan Convention (our Diocese will be electing our next bishop at an Electing Convention the day following our Diocesan Convention). The lay and clergy delegates to Diocesan Convention also elect the Diocese’s Deputies to General Convention. General Convention is the governing body of the entire Episcopal Church. It meets every three years, a triennium, and the next meeting will be in 2027 in Phoenix, Arizona. Each of the 108 dioceses is entitled to elect four clergy deputies and four lay deputies, as well as alternates for each, who take part in the General Convention. All of the deputies form a House of Deputies, which is the counterpart to the House of Bishops - we have a bicameral church legislature. The deputies and bishops spend the months before General Convention engaged in legislative committee work, taking all of the reports and proposed resolutions and budgets and statements and working to create a cohesive body of legislation that can be debated and voted for over the course of several days. Both houses - Deputies and Bishops, must pass legislation for it to take effect. In between the triennial meeting of General Convention, the church is governed by an Executive Council. This council is presided over by the officers of each house of the Convention - the Presiding Bishop, who is elected by the House of Bishops, and the President of the House of Deputies, which is elected by, you guessed it, the house of Deputies. Bishop Sean Rowe is the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church and Julia Ayala Harris is the President of the House of Deputies. Because Episcopalians love acronyms, they’re often referred to as the PB and the PHOD. There is also the Executive Office of General Convention, also called the General Convention Office, or GCO, which is the bureaucratic glue that holds the two Houses together and makes General Convention function. The interim Executive Officer of General Convention is Molly James. These officers, as well as the Treasurer of General Convention, currently Kurt Barnes, serve as officers of the Executive Council. Joining them are thirty eight elected members of Executive Council. Twenty of them, consisting of bishops, priests, deacons, and laity, are elected at General Convention. The other eighteen - 9 clergy and 9 lay members - are elected by the nine Provinces, geographical regions that I will talk about momentarily. The Executive Council meets quarterly and conducts the day-to-day business of the church. But most of the legislation passed by General Convention is larger in scope than an Executive Council. In between meetings of General Convention, the presiding officers of the two houses appoint Episcopalians from across the church to interim bodies, working groups who are tasked with taking the legislation passed by General Convention and applying it. Some interim bodies are standing commissions, carrying an ongoing mandate broader than one General Convention. I serve on one of them - the Standing Commission for Formation and Ministry Development. We are currently working on enacting legislation passed by General Convention around access to Spanish language resources, issues around clergy formation, gathering various Christian formation materials into an easily accessible online hub, and other projects. Other standing commissions include the Standing Commission on Liturgy and Music, the Standing Commission on World Mission, and the Standing Commission on Structure, Governance, Constitution and Canons (a mouthful, but I hear they have their own t-shirts, and I want one). Other interim bodies include Task Forces, constituted for a single three year term to work on a specific issue, as well as various ecumenical and interfaith bodies that the Episcopal Church sends representatives to. This triennium, some task forces include Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property and LGBTQ+ Inclusion. Any Episcopalian can apply to serve on an Interim Body - you don’t have to be on your church’s Vestry or be elected to Diocesan Convention or General Convention. After each General Convention the church opens an application process for Episcopalians interested in serving on an interim body to put their name forward for consideration. Supporting the General Convention, dioceses, interim bodies, and Episcopalians everywhere are the Presiding Bishops’ staff. The Presiding Bishop serves as the CEO of the Episcopal Church - our corporate name is the Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society, or DFMS. The DFMS is headquartered at 815 Second Avenue in New York City, and so sometimes the churchwide office is referred to as 815. The Presiding Bishops’ staff includes staff officers working on youth ministry, leadership development, racial justice, global mission, as well as supporting dioceses outside of the United States, ministry to members of the Armed Forces, and up until very recently, refugee resettlement. And so that’s our churchwide governance. Moving laterally across the org chart, I want to also mention Provinces. The 108 dioceses of the Episcopal Church are arranged in 9 geographical Provinces. Confusingly, Province is also the term used for member churches of the Anglican Communion - the Episcopal Church is a province of the Anglican Communion and also has 9 provinces. We are in Province 1! Province 1 is the 7 dioceses of New England - Western Massachusetts, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine. Provinces don’t quite fit into the “hierarchical” model of the Episcopal church. I serve as the Provincial Coordinator for Province 1 - it’s my job, and it’s not full time. Provinces look different in each region. Because Province 1 is geographically compact, we have some advantages that help us organize our ministry effectively. Provinces fill the gap between dioceses and the churchwide systems of governance and ministry. Province 1 supports its dioceses with a Province 1 School for Deacons, a modest grant program for ministries that connect multiple dioceses, and, recently, sponsorship of the Episcopal Path to Creation Justice, a program guiding Parishes through a year of discernment and action around climate issues. Each Province has a Provincial Synod- the provincial version of Diocesan Convention - and each diocese elects delegates to the Synod. In Province 1 we call our Synod Provincial Conference. The Synod has one extremely important churchwide mandate - electing a lay member and a clergy member to Executive Council. Beyond that duty, the Province is free to experiment and explore the best way to engage in ministry in its context. All this is a confusing rush to get through in one teaching sermon, and one might reasonably ask, amidst all of this governance and bureaucracy and structure, where is Jesus? Jesus is present in the faithful Episcopalians who put their time and talent and effort towards building and maintaining structures that allows our church to worship together, engage in pressing issues, and stay in faithful relationship across 50 states and over a dozen countries. Jesus and his kin-dom are present when Episcopalians in their diocesan and General Convention and Provincial Synods urge the church to speak on behalf of the marginalized. Jesus is with us when Episcopalians build provincial networks to take part in indigenous justice efforts or to raise up young leaders. Jesus is with us when we pray faithfully for servant leaders to take a turn in our various leadership bodies, whether on our Vestry, serving our Diocese, or stepping into churchwide leadership. We have certainly created a structure more complex and convoluted than what James and John’s mother was envisioning when she asked for her sons to sit at Jesus’s right and left, or when the disciples squabbled over their internal pecking order. I think there are days when what we have doesn’t quite pass the test of the leader being the servant rather than lording it over others. But the governance of our church reflects an honest engagement with the realities of two or three, or a million and a half, Episcopalians praying, serving, giving, and being church together. I pray, and I hope you will pray with me, for the leaders in our church - in our parish, diocese, province, and the whole Episcopal Church - and pray that they reflect and continue to reflect the model of Christ’s servant leadership. by lay preacher, Will Harron All rulers shall bow down before him, and all the nations do him service. For he shall deliver the poor who cries out in distress and the oppressed who has no helper. Amen Good morning saints! In the time of King Herod, after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea. So begins today’s gospel passage, the story of the three wise men, sometimes kings, sometimes Magi. These mysterious figures travel from the east to find a King they scried in the stars and encounter Jesus. Not minding the lowliness of his appearance, they bestow gifts on him from their treasure chest - gold and the sacred anointing spices of frankincense and myrrh, before travelling back to their homeland - and outfoxing Herod the schemer king in the bargain. This is such a great story, and it bookends a season of story. Christmas is a twelve-day-long feast, beginning in the evening of Christmas Eve and ending on the eve of Epiphany, the Twelfth-night. January sixth marks the formal Feast of the Epiphany, and the start of the Epiphany season between Christmas and Lent, a brief return to the regular weekly cycle of Christian life. But all throughout the twelve days and Epiphany, we are treated to the vivid stories of the birth and first days of Jesus. Christmas Eve and Christmas give us the stories of Mary and Joseph seeking shelter and finding it in a barn and the angels appearing to the shepherds announcing glad tidings. Holy Innocents tells the shocking story of the aftermath of the Wise Men’s visit, and the precarity of life amidst the brutal paranoia of empire. Holy Name enfolds Jesus into the Jewish life of his family. And at the Epiphany, we have this story of kingship, of mystery, and of wisdom. What are we to make of all of this? I think this set of stories is so striking partially because it is only through Matthew and Luke’s gospels that we get them. The literary quality of Mark is so striking in part because of its insistent pacing, opening with an adult Jesus beginning his ministry, and the style of John is expressed by opening with the creation of the Universe, and Jesus’s place in it. Luke and Matthew have different but often similar stylistic goals in their telling of the gospel. They both build richer settings, embellishing the spare stories told in Mark with additional details, settings, and explanations. Luke and Matthew feel more story-like, in part because they are aware of and playing into tropes - both in the Hebrew scriptures and in the Greek society they are enmeshed in. They are telling stories that their listeners are primed to hear, and understand. I think this is especially present in Matthew’s story of the Epiphany. His Gospel begins by situating Jesus in the genealogy of David, claiming Jesus’s kingship by tying it to the power of David’s special relationship with God. Matthew then tells of Jesus’s conception and birth by situating Jesus as the answer to prophetic riddles and cyphers about the continuation of Israel after the exile to Babylon and the destruction of the ancient kingdoms of David - another sign of Jesus being the long-promised king, right down to being born in Bethlehem, the ancient city of David. But the story of the Epiphany uses a different set of literary allusions. Wise men from the east - Magi, a word that in Greek derives from the Zoroastrian priests of the ancient Persian Empire, have arrived in Jerusalem. Practicing the arcane and scientific craft of astrology, which requires precise knowledge about the movement of the stars and the meanings of each possible configuration, these mysterious foreigners have determined that a King of the Jews has been born, and they have arrived, inexplicably and with no warning or expectation or further explanation, to give him homage. This isn’t like any other story in the bible. This is a set of tropes out of Greek literature, sounding more like Herotodus or Xenophon than Moses or Jeremiah. But it fits the setting - the Greek-speaking Hellenistic culture overlaid on the region by the conquests of Alexander the Great and his successors, even more than the Roman occupation, have deeply shaped the Judaea of this time. And even if Matthew is writing to an audience further afield, Hellenistic Greek culture and literature dominates the Eastern Mediterranean. Even with this shift in literary genre, Matthew continues to underscore his theme - Jesus is the promised King. The heavens and earth are bending themselves to proclaim it - a universal kingship that is both enmeshed in and greater than any previous understanding of kingship. Imagine the story set today, using some of our current frames of reference: Headline: Nuclear scientists from Los Alamos have just arrived in Jerusalem looking for the next President, because their isotopes have determined that he will be born in the West Bank. This reflects some of the strangeness of this story - and also the authority that the Magi have to make their particular claim, finding meaning in the unfathomable makings of the universe. I think another retelling, using a different set of modern literary references, can give us insight from a different angle. In ancient days, three wizards arrived at the great city in search of the promised king. The usurping lord of the city sought to turn the encounter to his advantage, but the wizards evaded the evil lord and made their way to the most unlikely place, to the most unlikely boy, in a humble village. Bowing to him, they offered him three gifts to use on his quest to kingship: Gold, frankincense and myrrh. They then disappeared, returning to their homeland and confusing the evil lord, who struck out in anger. The mythical, mystical dimensions of the Epiphany are apparent in this retelling. The echos of the hero’s journey, one of our current cultural tropes, give us places to anchor ourselves in the story. We know the child faces a long journey, that the visit of these wizards will send him far from his home, and that even when he triumphs at the end, there will be a bittersweet note to that ending. We can guess that these gifts will have some place in the real or symbolic ending of the story. And we can cheer the fall of the evil lord, whose power seems so real and tangible at the beginning. All of these stories, and all of our Christmas stories, and the Epiphany itself - teach us to pay attention. The Advent imperative to keep awake is redoubled. Incredible things are afoot - the powers of princes and potentates are of no account to the order of the universe, which is bending towards one born in the most lowly and unlikely of places. At the rising of his star, Jesus is born and the world takes notice - even Herod is forced to pay attention, and his cruellest orders are unable to halt the progress of the King of Kings. And this infant grows up, and just as we’ve heard this story before, we’ve heard the story of his ministry, his journey towards Jerusalem, and his kingship, which does not lead where the tropes, ancient and modern, lead us to look, leading conquering armies, being sworn into earthly office, being crowned and anointed atop glittering palaces - but instead leads to something more horrible and more amazing - the Crucifixion and Resurrection, the full re-ordering of life over death, the deliverance from the triumph of evil and the horror of death. This re-ordering is ongoing amidst us to this day. Even amidst the deaths of Holy Innocents, the journey of refugee families fleeing oppression and war, the forces of Empire rampant and rampaging in all of their power and paranoia - there is a star rising, a hope among us, and a child, a king, a promise, that shows us where God is: For he shall deliver the poor who cries out in distress and the oppressed who has no helper. He shall have pity on the lowly and poor; he shall preserve the lives of the needy. He shall redeem their lives from oppression and violence, and dear shall their blood be in his sight Amen By Lay Preacher, Will Harron So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are citizens with the saints and also members of the household of God Amen. Please sit. Good Morning Saints! This morning’s gospel portion from Mark begins with one of my favorite stories about Jesus. Earlier in Mark’s gospel, Jesus has sent out the twelve disciples two by two, giving them authority over the unclean spirits, to cast out the demons, and to anoint and heal the sick. I think about what that might look like today: Jesus calling his twelve together to transform and liberate communities from oppression, from paralyzing guilt, from the legacies of racism, sexism, homophobia and misogyny, from the crushing weight of corporate greed and environmental degradation - and to bring healing to communities where health care is inaccessible, unaffordable, or even illegal. Two thousand years later, we still need that healing, that liberation. And the disciples - these poor fisherfolk, renegade tax collectors, the scruffiest of small groups - did it. They healed, they cast out, they brought relief to the communities they entered and proclaimed deliverance to the homes they passed through. And they return to Jesus to tell him everything they’ve done. What a joy that must have been, to return and share their own good news. Saints, this is where I love Jesus the most. Because Jesus wants to hear, and Jesus wants to give his disciples rest after their period of courage and ministry, and Jesus recognizes that they’re stretched to the breaking point - approaching burnout, unable to even find the time to eat. So Jesus takes them away to a deserted place, for rest, for a vacation, for a retreat, a withdrawal for strengthening and sustenance and recommitting to their work. Jesus knows we can’t work all the time. God rested on the seventh day and the Gospel is a record that the disciples, as good a group as they are, aren’t better than God. And so they get in a boat and go away to a deserted place to rest. This doesn’t stop the needs of the world around them, though. People see them going, and follow on foot - there is such a desire for the healing they have brought, for the wholeness that Jesus’s good news shows is possible, for the casting out of spirits in a place sorely oppressed by legions of occupying powers. They follow on foot and show up at the deserted beach retreat Jesus has sought out for the disciples. But - and saints, this line teaches me day by day- this doesn’t cut their time of retreat and rest short. God rested on the seventh day and they aren’t better than God. And in fact, God shows up to allow them to rest. Jesus takes charge of the arriving crowds, in compassion giving them what they so deeply need, and the disciples are able to continue to recover from their own shift on the front lines of ministry. It might be hard to catch this message from today’s lectionary passage, because we hop twenty verses right to Jesus again ministering to the crowds. But early among those skipped verses is the disciples showing up at the end of their day of rest on the shore and finding Jesus still caring for the crowds - the disciples’ rest has been preserved. Saints, that is a liberating image for me. I don’t know about you, but life, work, ministry - can sometimes feel nonstop. I need to hear that I can take my rest, my retreat, my time away. Jesus, God, my communities, will show up and support me in this, and support those who I support when I step out to take my rest. It is a delivering word to hear Jesus give his disciples, who he demands so much of, rest. Saints - we aren’t Jesus in these stories. We are disciples. We are the crowds. We know there is always a savior there, giving healing, delivering from oppression, providing for us when we need him, alongside us when we are serving as his hands and feet, and shielding us when we need our holy rest. We are not machines. We aren’t made to run twenty-four-seven. And yet it can be so tough to yield to that gentle voice, to let go of my compulsion to keep control and keep going, and to take my rest. I’ve got to keep going, to get to the end of my work, my projects, my communities needs, my obligations, before I am worthy of stopping and resting. It’s a challenge to unlearn the formation of a world of twenty-four-seven, but it is necessary. I’m grateful for the teachers I’ve had in that task. One of those teachers was the Camino. In the summer of 2010, I had just completed my junior year at Williams College. I had been attending Saint John’s in Williamstown periodically, my first Episcopal church, and I was trying to figure out what I was doing with my life. I had recently switched from a biology major to a history major, had spent a year mentoring first-year students, and was loving my time playing in the marching band. But I was seeking something more, and I was seeking a greater sort of belonging. I applied for a summer fellowship for a “personal spiritual journey,” something offered through generous alumni support, and was awarded a fellowship to walk the Camino de Santiago, the way of Saint James across northern Spain. I wanted clarity about my life that I hadn’t yet achieved. I was twenty one, darn it, I should have things mostly figured out about the shape of my life. And so, I flew to Europe and took trains and busses to the start of the camino. I didn’t know anything about backpacking - I had a borrowed pack, too much clothes and equipment, heavy boots, and a fearlessness that in retrospect is both admirable and a little terrifying. And so I began walking. One day after another, the rhythm was the same - rise early in the morning in a hostel, eat the lightest of continental breakfasts, walk for a time, stop in a town and enjoy a mid-morning or mid-day meal, or pause at the side of the path and eat food I carried with me, arrive in mid-afternoon to a sleepy Spanish town in the middle of its siesta and check into my hostel, shower and freshen up, go to church if there was a pilgrim mass, have a big dinner at the hostel or a local restaurant that offered “pilgrim special” meals, go to bed early, and rise again early the next morning for another day of walking. It was a simple rhythm that was a soothing balm after three years of high pressure liberal arts college life. As I walked, I met people - other seekers, Americans, Europeans, Spanish folks - as well as people out for the physical challenge, for the travelling party scene that could be found if you looked for it, for particular religious obligations, or to mentally recover from war and trauma. I met Episcopalians - some my age, some older, and Catholics, and Presbyterians and Lutherans and atheists and agnostics. I met locals, some of whom welcomed me into the local hostels they maintained, or opened ancient churches for a curious pilgrim to see, or who were just living their lives alongside the path. And I learned more about my own capacity - to walk, to pick up, carry, and lay down burdens, to muddle on day by day when the going got tedious or to be amazed by the new wonders each day of sunlight and shadow on the landscape. I learned about Saint James, about the people who ascribed miracles of healing to him, to the mystical set of stories about the camino that has draw people to Santiago for centuries, and about how to pray when I had learned to desire communion and yet, there was no worship where communion was available - certainly practice for the long drought of the pandemic. And I learned that I needed that rest at the end of the day, that there were limits to how far I could go, that my body would take me as far as I needed if I cared for it, and that there was joy in listening to those limits and cherishing the opportunities for rest. After thirty three days I arrived in Santiago, and despite my joy, I hadn’t found the clarity I sought. I hadn’t figured it all out. And so I pressed onwards for three more days, towards the sea, to Fisterra where Europe meets the Atlantic, and one of the further endpoints of the Camino. I sat on a clifftop over the ocean, watching the sun set, while around me pilgrims celebrated. And I still hadn’t found the completion I sought. I turned my back on the ocean, turned my face towards the deepening night, and trudged back to the hostel. Where would I find this clarity, this certainty, this sense of knowing? Saints, it seems that everyone who has hiked the Camino left their mark on every available surface. Every door, every sign, every flat surface has some sort of graffiti, pilgrim markings left in pen and sharpie, spanning the profound to the mundane. And on the door of that last hostel, amidst the signatures of pilgrims finishing their hike and leaving their final wit and wisdom, I saw words that spoke to my soul. “There is no end.” My quest for clarity, for certainty, for finality, was one that wouldn’t end. My life is and ought to be marked by continual growth, continual change, continual seeking. I’m still on my pilgrimage, surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses, saints and strangers all seeking to live our lives in the way that gives the most life, that is delivered from the demonic lies that says we are not enough, we are unworthy of rest, that we don’t belong, that we are un-healable, un-savable, un-lovable. Saints, you and I are together seeking Jesus continually - whether we are the crowd seeking Jesus out for healing and knowledge, or the disciples returning to Jesus tired and with full hearts to share from our ministering. We are constantly seeking, constantly following, constantly drawn on in our pilgrimage because there is something in this Christ we recognize. Like the crowds in Genessaret, we recognize that healing is here, that hope is here, that liberation is possible and we get up and we run towards it. In Jesus we recognize that there is more to life than an empire that says war is peace and slavery is freedom and that an unjust status quo is the best we can get. In Christ, we recognize love and we believe, we hope, we know, that transformative justice, healing, and reconciliation, are possible. In Jesus, we find ourselves changed from strangers into fellow pilgrims, saints and citizens, incorporated into a body that is more diverse and more expansive than we can even imagine, and more powerful than empires can dream. Our pilgrimage is one of rising and setting, of seeking and following, healing each other, and then resting, and experiencing our own healing. There is no end to our journey together, but there is rest for the weary. There is no end to the things we can do in Christ, but there is healing and wholeness for the wounded. There is no end to the wonders of love - but there is work for us to do, together, as saints and citizens and siblings in the Body of Christ. Amen by Will Harron, Lay Preacher “That Ridiculous Faith Reckoned as Righteousness” The poor shall eat and be satisfied, and those who seek God shall praise God: "May your heart live for ever!" I’m currently involved in the world’s slowest bible study. There’s no record-checking to prove this claim, but it certainly feels true. For the past year or so, my friend Bird and I have been meeting on a voice call to read through the book of Genesis. It started out weekly, but we’ve both lost track of our schedules, and so are meeting much less regularly at the moment. But the bible study was also slow because we were taking our time. Each time we met, we’d read through a chapter out loud, spend some time in silence, and then spend a half hour or so reflecting on the text. Genesis is 50 chapters long, so this is not a fast process – and Bird and I are nearly at the end. But this study has given me a certain familiarity with the text, a joyful connection to this story and its characters; its families; and its promises. And so, reading through this morning’s lesson from Genesis, I was struck by some of what is included, and what is excluded from the portion. As the lesson shares, Abram is ninety-nine years old and the Lord appears to him and announces that God will make a covenant with Abram. Abram, in deference to God, falls on his face, and God continues: this covenant will make Abram the ancestor of a multitude of great nations, great in both the numerical sense and in the power exercised by those descendants. Abram will now be called Abraham, and his wife Sarai is now to be called Sarah, and she will be blessed by giving birth to a son. The lesson skips over 8 verses that detail that the sign of this covenant is circumcision, and the mechanics of how that sign is carried out, which is fine, but it also ends at verse 16, which I find interesting. In verse 17, Abraham reacts to this pronunciation by once again falling on his face, but this time in laughter. “Can a child be born to a man who is a hundred years old? Can Sarah, who is ninety years old, bear a child?” There is a comedic resonance to Abram, falling down on his face before God both in awe and wonder as well as in the throes of hilarity. That makes me wonder, why is our lesson structured this way? What were the framers of the lectionary up to? Sometimes our lessons from the first testament flow in a continuous story, especially in the long stretches of Sundays after Pentecost. In Lent, in Year B of our cycle of readings, however, the first testament lessons serve to echo themes found in the later lesson or the Gospel reading. Today’s portion from the fourth chapter of Paul’s letter to the Romans gives the key to what this particular selection from Genesis is highlighting. There is a pretty direct connection between the two. Paul is talking about faith – specifically about Abraham’s faith – being what connects us to God’s promises, rather than following laws. This is how he explains it: Abraham lived before the covenant of laws that God made with Moses. Despite not having those laws to follow, he was worthy of God’s promise. Thus, Paul writes, following the law of the covenant isn’t the key thing to being worthy of God’s promise – instead, Paul writes to his audience of Jewish and Gentile followers of Christ in Rome, what is most important is faith. Paul is being a little tricky, playing a little fast and loose with the story to make his point. This morning’s lesson is just one part of a complicated argument Paul is making about the unity of the emerging Christian community, and about the bonds of that unity. He is trying to do something very challenging, to weave ties between the different and feuding communities of Christ-followers in Rome, trying to summon connections that can transcend the previous markers of community, and can also transcend previous grudges and bad feelings – the things that separated one body of believers from another. This is challenging at the best of times, and he’s doing this from across the Mediterranean in a letter dictated to Tertius and read aloud in Rome by Phoebe. So we can perhaps forgive him for fudging some minor details in order to make a larger point – Abraham believed in God’s promises and it was reckoned to him as righteousness; therefore, according to Paul, we who believe in God’s actions in raising Christ from the dead are also connected to that faith which is righteousness. That concept is a tough one to wrap my mind around. “Faith reckoned as righteousness.” What does that even mean, for faith to be reckoned the same as righteousness? My mind immediately resists the concept, thinking of contemporary examples of blind faith leading to catastrophic results. Was that righteousness? How many pieces of our broken world, fragments of the nightmare made from God’s dream, are the result of faith in something death-dealing being treated as righteousness? So, Paul, you’ve got me in a double bind. Because, thinking back to Abraham – and that verse which was omitted from our lectionary - Abraham immediately laughs at God’s promise. Abraham immediately treats it as ridiculous. He falls on his face laughing. “Can a child be born to a man who is a hundred years old?” What does it mean for us that in the text of Genesis, Abraham questions God’s promise, even as Paul makes the claim that “He did not weaken in faith when he considered his own body, which was already as good as dead (for he was about a hundred years old).” Paul is no fool – even when we disagree with him, we must give him credit as a skilled interpreter of scripture. What, exactly, is Paul doing here? Let’s carry that question with us to the Gospel lesson. Our Lenten gospel lessons, in one week, have hopped halfway through Mark. We’re now in chapter 8. Just before this passage, Jesus asked the disciples who they thought he was, and Peter confessed his belief, his faith, that Jesus was the Messiah, a promised, anointed deliverer of the people Israel from colonized oppression. Nodding, Jesus tells them that he must undergo suffering, be rejected by the religious authorities, be killed, and to rise again three days later. Peter, perhaps emboldened by the experience of confessing faith in his teacher’s divine status, steps forward again, takes Jesus aside, and rebukes him. That’s not what the Messiah means. Suffering, rejection, death – those aren’t the plot points of the saving of the world. Those are what Peter already sees around him. His faith demands more. Perhaps he doesn’t register Jesus rising on the third day – perhaps it is too ludicrous to consider, or the audacity of the claim underscores the need to get Jesus on message, to keep being the Messiah Peter believes in. Jesus won’t have this. “Turning, and looking at his disciples, he rebuked Peter and said, ‘Get behind me, Satan! For you are setting your mind not on divine things but on human things.’ Let’s pause here. This can land with a shock. Peter has just expressed two moments of tender vulnerability with Jesus – first confessing faith in him, then privately pushing back against claims he doesn’t think are fruitful. And Jesus rebukes him and calls him Satan in front of the other disciples. But I believe it is fruitful to dig some more at this. For one, if you recall from last week’s Gospel lesson, Jesus has met Satan. Jesus has experienced being tempted, being accused, being asked to set aside who he truly is for what the world and society around him think the Son of God should act like:
This, to Jesus, is Satan. And so, he rebukes Peter. This is not the way. This is not divine. This is not what Messiah means. And Jesus calls the crowd, speaking to and beyond his disciples – to follow him is to deny oneself, to take up their cross and follow him towards his death. Trying to save your life will fail, but letting go of that fear, stepping with Jesus across the chasm of pain, rejection, humiliation, and death – will bring life, will save life. What good is gaining the whole world – the goal of princes and generals and conquerors and rulers throughout time – when you’re still going to die anyway? That isn’t the divine dream. That’s a human nightmare. Jesus’s rebuke of Peter is a challenge to his friend, an invitation to broaden his faith beyond a narrow conception of what God-breathed liberation looks like and into the expansive faith that destroys death. It is a challenge to the disciples, and to all who hear it – that the Good News isn’t the pursuit of power or glory, but the denial of it, bringing freedom and overcoming death. This is faith reckoned as righteousness – faith that, despite monuments of power, the chronicles of oppression, and the pursuit of death-dealing to stave off oblivion – the true divine thing in this world, the way to follow Jesus, is to give all of that up, give up life itself, to walk in love as God loves us. This sort of faith, for Paul, despite its foolishness, is hope. This faith can bridge estranged communities and heal distrust, can make reparation and repair breaches. It doesn’t matter for Paul that Abraham laughs at the ridiculousness of God’s promise. It is a ridiculous promise, just as the promise of resurrection is ridiculous. But we can laugh at something even as it compels us to follow. Amidst war and genocide; amidst the seemingly irretrievable state of our political institutions, especially in light of unending gun violence; amidst environmental catastrophe; amidst the pervasive and persistent anti-Blackness, homophobia, racism, transphobia, misogyny, and hate within our society and amidst the death caused by such hate; we still get up each new day, we still dream of justice, we still find hope in the love that surrounds us. That is ridiculous, and yet it is true. We may be as good as dead, as Paul quips of Abraham. We’re all going to die, and there’s no escaping it. But the way of Love, the way of divine things, of denying death-dealing systems and embracing the hope that our faith offers, remains. God always offers this mercy, bringing us back again and again to that ridiculous faith which is reckoned as righteousness. Amen. |
We are blessed to have a diversity of preaching voices in our parish. Our guild of preachers is a mixture of lay and clergy. We hope you enjoy the varied voices. Meet our Preachers
All
Archives
January 2026
|



