 By The Rev. Dr. Molly Scherm
Many would agree that Christmas is the most beloved holiday of Christians, and Easter is certainly the most joyous. We can’t deny the centrality of Good Friday, however. The cross, the instrument of Jesus’ execution at the hands of the Roman state, is the universally-recognized symbol of the Christian faith. It stands at the front of our worship spaces and on our steeples, and we wear it around our necks, bow when it passes by at the head of our processions, and carve it on the headstones when we bury our dead. I think I have probably shared the story, before, of one of my earliest memories of my own religious thought. I don’t know how old I was, though I’m sure it was sometime during my elementary school years, when I asked my Aunt Tinka “If it’s the day Jesus died, why do we call it Good Friday?”. This is an interesting memory because my Aunt Tinka was probably the most unlikely person in the family to ask such a deep religious question. Tinka was a good Congregationalist, but she did not talk about faith. She must have been quite taken aback by my question. Her reply, after she paused to consider her words, was the explanation of Good Friday that we all grew up with. It was something like this: “Jesus died to save us from our sins, and that’s a good thing.” I doubt if I found the answer helpful as a child, and I still struggle with the same question - not why we designate today as “Good Friday”, of course, but the question of how to make sense of Jesus’ death. What it means to me, to us, that Jesus, the embodiment of God’s love in the world, chose to submit to the world’s evil. It seems that Christians have always wanted to rationalize Jesus’ death, from the earliest days of the Church when Mark wrote in his gospel that “Jesus came…to give his life as a ransom for many.” (Mark 10:45). We have a holy week hymn that sums it up perfectly, and we’ve all sung it many times: Here are middle verses of the hymn “There is a green hill far away”. He died that we might be forgiven He died to make us good That we might go at last to heaven Saved by his precious blood. There was no other good enough To pay the price of sin. He only could unlock the gate Of heaven and let us in. Surely the ugliest, most pernicious element in this kind of theology is the notion that God the Creator required sacrifice, required Jesus’ brutal death in order to accept humankind, to offer forgiveness. Theologian Bruce Epperly says that this brand of theology justifies Jesus’ crucifixion as “sacred violence”1. The reason many of us have struggled with Atonement theology is that a God who requires “sacred violence” is not the God who Jesus preached and Jesus embodied. So if we reject traditional formulations of atonement theology, where does that leave us? How else are we to understand Jesus’ sacrifice, his willing acceptance of his own execution? I think there are two ways to think about this that provide me, at least, with something that makes more sense than the explanations I grew up with. The first is that Jesus went to his own death not because God needed it, but because it tells a truth we needed to hear (and still do). Jesus’ death was the inevitable end to the confrontation between his message of radical love and service and the power structures in the religious and political establishments of his time. Jesus had riled people up. He challenged the purity system of the Temple establishment AND the economic exploitation of the Temple. He threatened (in the minds of the Roman authorities) to instigate discontent. He would not go away quietly. He had to be silenced. The way of the power structures in that time and place was to execute those who instigated discontent. I don’t think the world is much different today. Jesus was innocent of wrongdoing. He was killed because the power establishments of Jerusalem were trying to preserve their own power, to maintain a status quo that served their own interests. The crucifixion is not just a historic event. As with so much of the gospel story, it’s a demonstration of who we are, and here it is: we are still working to preserve our own power and control. We still demonize those who are different from ourselves. We still want to avoid and silence those voices that challenge us with truths that don’t fit easily into the ways we think about ourselves and the way we think thing are, that challenge the ways we like to do things. We judge others and do what we think we need to do to get others to conform with our own interests. Jesus knew that confrontation was coming: he predicted his own death on many occasions. The Creator knew it was coming. That is different from wanting it or needing it. As far as I can see, God did not REQUIRE Jesus to die in order to forgive us our sins. Jesus preached and lived love, compassion, and acceptance throughout his ministry, and he lived it until the end. Although the gospels make it clear that facing up to the violence of the world’s powers was not easy for Jesus, he trusted in God. Perhaps we needed Jesus to die in order to provide a stark enough truth to shake us out of our complacency. Jesus’ death provides us the means to face up to our own deepest failings. Our fear of death that stands in the way of our trusting God Our fear of losing control that stands in the way of our trusting God Our fear of pain and suffering – whether physical or psychological – that stands in the way of our trusting God. Jesus’ death provides an ugly picture, BUT it has the capacity to transform us, just as life-shattering experiences often provide us with the opportunity to radically reconfigure our lives. Jesus’ death has the capacity to transform us because it is followed by Easter. But I said there were two ways of thinking about the crucifixion that can speak truth to us today, and the second is closely related to the first. There’s a way of thinking doesn’t rationalize Jesus’ death. It doesn’t find reasons to call it “good”. It accepts that this is the nature of a fallen world, that human sin and self-interest continue to crucify, and we are the witnesses. Christ is crucified in the deaths of Renee Goode and Alex Pretti, and before them, George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. Christ is crucified as hard-won policies protecting the environment are dismantled in the interest of economic gain. Christ is crucified when weapons of destruction are deployed in the service of ensuring political dominance. The gospels all testify that a group of women stood by to watch the crucifixion, including Mary Magdalene, Mary, Jesus’ mother, and others, and John’s gospel adds that John, the beloved disciple, was there too. Theologian Diana Butler Bass recently posted a reflection on witnessing evil. Here’s what she suggests: “Witnesses watch events unfold, even when hearts break. Even when tempted to look away. Witnessing is more than being a bystander, an onlooker. Witnessing is active — it means bearing testimony to what one has seen, to provide evidence of the truth of a thing, no matter how shocking, brutal, or inhumane. Witnesses tell a story…” Bass goes on to say: “We all must witness. Because witnessing the pain turns us from mere bystanders to actors, to be part of the story on the side of victims. To not let the authorities lie about the suffering, violence, and injustice.”2 So perhaps this Friday is “Good” because it shows us who we are without God, and it shows us that Jesus told us the truth. It shows us that Jesus’ way of love and mercy are what saves us. It can be good if it helps us to move beyond being bystanders, and helps us to tell the stories we need to tell, and to take an active part with God in changing and healing the world. In this Holy Week, let us pray that we may be touched and transformed by the cross, that it may be for us a way to the generous and compassionate and bold living that God calls us to. In Jesus’ name, and for his sake. 1http://www.patheos.com/blogs/livingaholyadventure/2015/03/reclaiming-good-friday-salvation-without-divine-violence/#ixzz3VX1orYp2 2 “Witnesses to the bad news”, Diana Butler Bass, the Cottage, January 15, 2026
0 Comments
 By The Rev. Dr. Molly Scherm
I love Nicodemus. If some of you found the gospel lesson we just heard utterly incomprehensible, don’t worry. Today’s gospel is a tough passage that is still the object of lively debate among scholars. I love Nicodemus not so much because of what we hear in the interaction with Jesus that we just heard, but because of the whole arc of his story in John’s gospel. But more about that later. So let’s start with a word, first, about John’s gospel. As you know, we have a three-year lectionary cycle of lessons assigned for us to use throughout the church year. The first year, which is what we’re following now, mostly traces Matthew’s account of Jesus’ story, and then we’ll move on to years mostly focused on Mark and Luke. Poor John doesn’t get his own year, so the arrangers of the lectionary insert passages from John into the other three years. This is one of those passages. And here’s what’s interesting: neither Matthew, Mark, or Luke ever mention Nicodemus, but he shows up three times in John’s gospel. What is it about Nicodemus that seemed important enough to John that he included him? What does John want us to learn from Nicodemus? One thing, and I suspect we can all identify with this, is that Jesus’ encounter with Nicodemus gives us a glimpse of an individual struggling with questions of faith and it invites us to explore what the idea of spiritual rebirth means. Nicodemus was an important person: he was quite a big cheese. As a Pharisee, he was part of the elite – better educated than most, a member of the Sanhedrin (or ruling council at the Jerusalem Temple), he was an insider and would have been accorded lots of respect and privilege. You’ve heard me say before that I think the Pharisees are given an unfairly bad rap in the gospels. Pharisees were the most progressive of the Jewish sects that existed in Jesus’ time. Despite their rigidity in relation to applying the Law of Moses - which led to their conflicts with Jesus over his sabbath practices, for example - they believed that interpretation of the Torah, of scripture, was a matter of ongoing process, ongoing revelation. They didn’t assume that they had all of the answers, but rather, were open to an evolving understanding of God’s intent for humankind, which may be what prompted Nicodemus to seek Jesus out to learn more about the new rabbi’s teachings. It would certainly have been unusual for a member of the religious establishment to seek out Jesus, and so it’s not surprising that he did so under cover of night. Nicodemus would not have wanted to advertise any association with this radical religious teacher about whom his community had such reservations. It seems that he couldn’t resist the impulse to learn more, however: he couldn’t dismiss his sense that “something is going on here….” We never actually find out, in John’s narrative, what Nicodemus wanted from Jesus, because immediately after his initial statement acknowledging Jesus as a “teacher who has come from God,” Jesus effectively takes over the conversation to launch into a line of instruction, with Nicodemus practically scrambling to keep up. Jesus’ instruction addresses what one needs in order to enter the kingdom of God. It includes a Greek term – anothen -that is difficult to translate, and that has caused consternation and controversy within Christian communities: Jesus tells Nicodemus EITHER: No one can see the Kingdom of God without being born from above. OR No one can see the Kingdom of God without being born again. Nicodemus assumes the second meaning and takes it literally; he gets stuck on and bewildered by the notion of a person having to physically re-enter the womb and experience literal rebirth. Jesus, of course, is talking about something else, about spiritual rebirth, about making a fresh start. He tells Nicodemus that rebirth is not a matter of the physical self, but of the spiritual self, and that it is the work of the Spirit, leading one to new life. This verse has been understood by some Christian groups as a specific requirement. Some believe and preach the necessity of being “born again” in a particular kind of experience, that one must have in order to be “saved”. This isn’t the way we understand things in the Episcopal Church. But back to our gospel passage. After the exchange about rebirth, Jesus’ meeting with Nicodemus transitions into a sermon. I already mentioned the fact that John’s gospel differs from the Matthew, Mark and Luke. It was written anywhere from twenty to forty years after the other gospels and includes long passages of discourse – some of them very long – that are attributed to Jesus, and that represent what the young church had come to believe about the purpose of Jesus’ life. John’s community told stories that have Jesus explaining the meaning of his life and ministry. The brief sermon that we hear Jesus offering to Nicodemus is one of these. It includes what may be most quoted verse in the Bible, a verse that Marin Luther described as “whole gospel in a single verse”, John 3:15: For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life. And the final verse of the text further reiterates and reinforces the theme of God’s expansive and inclusive love: Indeed, God did not send the Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him. *** So what might Jesus’ words mean for us today? Is spiritual rebirth what we should be hoping for? Is it what the God who “so loved the world” wants for us? Is it something that takes place as an event that we should be seeking and working toward? Jesus tells Nicodemus that in order to see or enter the kingdom of God, a person must be born of the Spirit. Our ancestors in faith often assumed that in speaking of the kingdom of God, Jesus was speaking of a realm that exists outside of the world we live in, one that we can hope to enter after our physical life ends. Today we no longer understand God’s realm to be separate from our lives here and now. Today we understand Jesus to have been preaching about what former Presiding Bishop Michael Curry refers to as “God’s dream”, the community of love, justice, and peace that God intends for all of God’s creation. This reign of God is a time of living in right relationship with ourselves, with one another and with God; it is a reality we can build in the present, and it extends into the “eternal life” that Jesus speaks to Nicodemus about. To be “born of the Spirit”, I believe, simply means living a life that grows out of our relationship with God. I can best understand the idea of spiritual rebirth as being found in the gradual path of spiritual growth that we all work at over the course of our lifetimes. We work at spiritual growth through prayer and reflection, through study, through participation in worship, and through the experience of life in community, especially through our work together in service to others and to God’s world. Lent is the perfect time to focus on spiritual growth. I also know that we can also experience instances of dramatic change of our spiritual awareness, times when the circumstances or events of our lives produce in us real moments of transformation, of opening and expansion, of new self-knowledge and deepening in our relationship with God. Some of these times of change grow out of the joyful moments in life – I think of the birth of children and how profoundly that experience alters our view of what is important – but many times our spiritual development is painful, and grows out of times of loss and failure that bring us up short, requiring us to look at the truth of our lives in new ways. Jesus’ words to Nicodemus about spiritual rebirth suggest relationship and experience rather than doctrine and dogma. They describe a kind of spiritual growth that depends on courage and trust, but that leads to new possibilities of life marked by freedom, joy, peace, and love. And so, once again, I return to why I love Nicodemus. John’s gospel never tells us what impact the conversation with Jesus had on him, but the whole of John’s gospel provides quiet suggestions. Nicodemus appears two more times in John. As a member of the Sanhedrin, the Jewish court, John tells us that Nicodemus spoke up in defense of offering Jesus a fair trial, at the time of his arrest. And finally, Nicodemus is the one who brings myrrh and aloes, along with Joseph of Arimathea, to prepare Jesus’ body for burial after his crucifixion. Did Nicodemus turn toward rebirth, toward a life of faith in Jesus? It certainly seems to be John’s implication. Nicodemus’ story promises us that rebirth is possible, that change can happen. And if it can happen to Nicodemus, it can happen to us. May we, in this season of Lent, like Nicodemus, dare to bring our questions and our uncertainties forward before God. May we find in ourselves the will and the trust to invest in our own spiritual growth. In these violent and disturbing and frightening times, may we keep our eyes on Jesus. I came across a line that stayed with me, just yesterday. Quoted in the context of response to our nation’s attack on Iran, it also speaks to the work of investing in our own spiritual growth. It comes from Etty Hillesum, a Dutch Jewish writer who was deported to and executed at Auschwitz. She said: “Ultimately, we have just one moral duty: to reclaim large areas of peace in ourselves, more and more peace, and to reflect it towards others. And the more peace there is in us, the more peace there will also be in our troubled world.* May we, through God’s grace, travel toward new life in community with our siblings in faith and live into an openness of heart, so that we, too, may be reborn of the Spirit. Amen *Cited in “Those Who Make Peace”, The Cottage, Diana Butler Bass, Feb 28, 2026  by Rev. Dr. Molly Scherm
On my day spent with my grandson Elliot this week, we played several rounds of his current favorite board game, “Race to the Roof”. Like the old game Chutes and Ladders, each player tries to get to the end first, by rolling dice. In Race to the Roof, if you roll a six, you pick a card that has a picture of an object found somewhere in the house – the teddy bear in the baby’s room, the turkey on the dining room table, the first aid kit in the bathroom, and the like – and when you’ve found the pictured object you then move to that room, either gaining or losing ground in your journey to the roof. Elliot desperately wants to roll sixes: it’s the basic thrill of gambling, but I’ll give him credit that when a card sends him back to the basement, he’s good humored about it. At four years old, he’s inclined to roll the die off the table and, when I can’t see it, tell me he rolled a six. Sometimes when he rolls a one or two, he simply asks “Can I roll again?”. It's Elliot’s desire for “do-overs” that was surfacing in my mind as I sat with this morning’s gospel lesson this week. We all want and long for do-overs, for second chances when the dice have not given us what we wanted. But often enough, the do-overs we want are the chance to rectify the mistakes that result from our own actions Many of our errors in life result from hurrying, or from not paying enough attention. My colleagues in St. Andrew’s Guild know that we need lots of do-overs in knitting and stitching – when you find that you dropped a stitch several rows back, or sewed a seam with the fabric facing the wrong way. These are trivial do-overs. Some of our more serious life errors are also results of not paying enough attention, or from rushing or carelessness. But many of the choices we make that we’d like a second chance at are from acts that we knew at the time were problematic – when we tried doing something the easy way rather than the hard-but-right way, or when we are acting out of fear, or selfishness. Sometimes we’re fortunate and we get do-overs, but in the more serious mistakes, the do-overs are usually not as easy as re-rolling the die in a board game or picking up a dropped stitch. Anyone familiar with 12-Step Programs used by Alcoholics Anonymous and other addiction-recovery programs is aware that among the important steps practiced in recovering from addiction and moving toward wholeness is the work of acknowledging harm that one actions have caused, and making amends. We can begin to move on when the person we have hurt chooses to forgive us, in time, or when we are able to rebuild what we lost. The wisdom behind this practice in 12-Step programs is that our errors - when we don’t do the work of taking responsibility and making amends – can become toxic in our lives. They DO US spiritual harm. The regret, guilt and shame of our wrongdoings - or, perhaps, the delusional self justification we engage in as a means of escaping our guilt – can cause us to become the secondary casualties of our own mistakes. Doing the work of fixing things we did wrong the first time is deeply important. And tragically important is the fact that some mistakes can’t be undone, or made amends for, and the consequences can last a lifetime. I still think about a wonderful young man I worked with as a Student Leader in the dorm when I was on the faculty at Northfield Mount Hermon School. Not too long after his graduation he made the terrible mistake of driving under the influence and caused an accident that resulted in a death. I’m very sure that even having served a period of incarceration, he will never get over that mistake. *** What does this have to do with this 3rd Sunday of Easter? Today’s gospel from John is a wonderful, interesting story with lots of implications, but one of its themes is that it’s a do-over story, a story of Jesus’ providing the second chance that Simon Peter quite desperately needs. But first, a comment about historical context – Today’s gospel from John 21 is the third and final post resurrection appearance of Christ in John’s gospel. It immediately follows last week’s story of Jesus’ appearance to the disciples on the day of the resurrection, his gift of the Holy Spirit, and his appearance a week later to Thomas. Today’s breakfast on the beach is the ending of John’s Gospel. Do you remember how last week’s gospel ended? Here’s what we heard: Jesus performed many other signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not recorded in this book. But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name. Sounds like the ending, doesn’t it? But then in the following chapter, today’s gospel, we hear that Afterward Jesus appeared again to his disciples, by the Sea of Galilee. It happened this way, And we hear about a disappointing fishing trip, a stranger on the shore giving advice, a miraculous catch, a breakfast cooked on a fire, and then an intimate and powerful exchange between the resurrected Christ and the disciple Peter. Scholars conclude that this 21st chapter of John, like the ending of Mark, is a later add-on to the gospel’s original form. It’s believed that what sounds like an ending after the Thomas story WAS the original ending. But the Johannine community, later, felt a need to tack on one more story (and at its end we get a second summary conclusion.) We can speculate on why this additional story was important – and many have – but one of the most compelling theories is that the community needed to account for Peter’s prominence in the leadership of the early church, especially in the light of the damning story of Peter’s denial of Jesus after Jesus’ arrest. Peter is the one who initiates the nighttime fishing expedition that brings up nothing but empty nets. When the stranger on the shore suggests where to drop the net that is then filled with fish, John exclaims to Peter, “It is the Lord!” Peter’s response - not unlike Adam and Eve in the Garden hiding themselves when God appears after they have eaten the fruit – is to cover himself and to jump out of the boat. Peter is frightened. Peter is ashamed. He is does not want to face the Master who predicted that Peter would deny him, and who Peter did, in fact, deny three times. Somehow, the return to shore and the need to haul in the net with its enormous catch enables Peter to get beyond his own distress and withdrawal, and he rejoins the group, now being fed the meal Jesus had prepared - a breakfast of fish and bread. It is after the meal has ended that the important moment comes: When they had finished eating, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon son of John, do you love me more than these?” “Yes, Lord,” he said, “you know that I love you.” Jesus said, “Feed my lambs.” Jesus asked Peter the question not the once, but three times. Did Peter notice the details that John wants us, as readers, to notice – that the triplicate question giving Peter the opportunity to affirm his relationship with Jesus is a parallel to that earlier moment when Peter did it wrong, both exchanges taking place around a charcoal fire? In the first instance Peter’s fear prevented him from owning his relationship. Finally, he is able to affirm that his bond with Jesus is that of love. Jesus is not only giving Peter a do-over, but he gives him the blessing of a purpose, as well: Feed my lambs. Feed my sheep. Jesus gives Peter the gift of forgiveness, but he also gives him the reason to move forward beyond the fear and shame that have paralyzed him, and he gives him the work that will fill up his moving beyond. And the story ends as it began, with Jesus’ invitation to Peter, to disciples, to us, to Follow me. Jesus’ final gift to disciples (in John) is gift of encouragement, of nourishment, of reminding them who they are, who they are called to follow and who they are called to be. Likewise, this is Jesus’ gift to us. In baptism we are commissioned to share life and ministry of Jesus, but remembering how to do it is hard. We fall short. Get sidetracked. We compromise. We fail to follow through. We get discouraged. We fall back to old ways, failing to bear witness to faith in living Christ. So WE need lots of do-overs. Jesus stands on shore saying “Try again”. “Put your net on the other side.” God looks beyond our failures. She not only accepts our shortcomings and invites us to try again, He not only feeds us, but God also invites us to give what we have - to bring ourselves, our skills & resources, our love – to the feast. As Jesus did with Peter, God gives us do-overs. God calls us to follow, to live in Christ, to feed God’s sheep. Alleluia, Christ is risen. The Lord is risen indeed, Alleluia.  By The Rev. Dr. Molly Scherm
Our readings this morning speak to us of unease, of longing, waiting, and lamenting. As is so often the case, scripture touches the realities we are living in our own lives. We’ve heard two stories. Both of them involve longing and waiting, and they shine a light on what it is to live in the complexities of being faithful. The first of the two stories involves a moment of encounter between God and Abram from the book of Genesis. Abram had been spoken to by God twice before, at this point, but while God had spoken, Abram had not responded with words. Now, Abram replies to God. He has a burning question, an unfulfilled longing he can no longer keep silence with: he has no heir, no inheritance. For Abram’s people, having “everlasting life” consisted in having the legacy of descendants to carry on one’s memory, and an estate to provide for them. At the point of today’s passage in Gen. 15, God had already promised heirs and land, but to Abram, the promise is not really real. He has heard God’s promises, but has no lived reality through which to make sense of them. For Abram, they are empty words. He has been faithful: he has followed God’s direction in leaving his home without knowing where he is going, traveled to places appointed, and continued through various challenges and hardships. But he is having an increasingly hard time trusting the promises when there has been no confirmation IN EXPERIENCE. Abram has been waiting, and waiting is eroding his confidence. So God reiterates the promise: “Look toward heaven and count the stars, if you are able to count them." Then he said to him, "So shall your descendants be. I am the Lord who brought you from Ur of the Chaldeans, to give you this land to possess.” But still Abram longs for a sign, and questions: "O Lord God, how am I to know that I shall possess it?" And so Abram and God enact a ritual. To us it is a pretty strange ritual, but it is customary to that time and culture. When two parties are making covenant, they jointly offer animal sacrifice, splitting animal carcasses into two and passing between them. The act symbolically states their willingness to suffer same fate as the split carcasses if they should dare to break their covenant promises. In the Genesis text, a flaming torch – foreshadowing the pillar of fire that will indicate God’s presence in leading Israelites in the wilderness after their delivery from Egypt – passes between the parts, signifying God’s commitment to God’s promises. The storyteller doesn’t tell us, however, whether Abram’s disquiet was eased by the vision. Today’s gospel also speaks of longing and of waiting Jesus’ daily ministry involved the work of healing, providing what was needed to those he met. He demonstrated the presence of God’s Realm, God’s Kingdom, breaking into the world by his acts of providing what was needed -
Jesus does these acts of deliverance and healing as demonstration of his message of God’s love and God’s nearness. At the point at which we listen in on today’s story, Jesus is also traveling gradually toward Jerusalem – the city that had historically rejected and killed the prophets. He had received recent news of Herod’s beheading of John the Baptizer, and now a group of Pharisees inform him that Herod wants to kill him. Jesus knows, in general at least, that this is the fate he is traveling toward, but has his own timetable. He has more work to do before his work is complete – today and tomorrow (he says)- … and on the third day I will finish my work. Third day refers to the time of resurrection. Jesus’ work includes his daily ministry AND his arrest and death and resurrection, which will allow his disciples to finally understand the whole point of his life and teaching, that God’s Realm is present here and now. Jesus’ ministry does not end with his death, but is completed on the third day. Just as Abram longed for an heir and a legacy, and for certainty regarding God’s promises, Jesus expresses, in response to the news of Herod’s dangerous intentions, his own longing. His response to the Pharisees’ reminder of what lies ahead is compassion.
Abram longs for an heir, a legacy, understanding of G’s promises. Herod longs to eliminate Jesus as a threat. Jesus longs to protect Jerusalem from its own worst inclinations. Longing for that which will bring us respite from the worries and fears of life is always a part of the human experience. Often we long for relief from the difficulties of our personal lives, for ourselves and those we love
In this time in the history of our nation and the world we are also living with tremendous anxiety (and often with anger) in relation to the ways in which the policies and practices of our nation have shifted. We read in the news, daily, of the loss of protection for the vulnerable in our nation and world, of the loss of livelihood for many, of the abandonment of measures that support the wellbeing of our environment. So, much of our longing, like Abram’s, is for assurance that the future is not as bleak as it looks. For Abram, and for the author of the psalm we sang together this morning, the answer is that we must maintain trust in God to provide what we need, and that we must accept God’s timetable, rather than our own. Honestly, it is hard to feel reassured by this when we see suffering, and fear that terrible mistakes are being made in our world. At the same time, there is some relief (for me, at least,) in knowing that even as we are obligated to do what we can do to work for what is right, at the end of the day, we can leave it in God’s hands. From Jesus we learn two things.
And in these troubling times, we need to up our games by calling out for the justice we long for, by sending our postcards to the White House, and calling our representatives, and signing petitions. As we continue to move forward with as much patience and hope as we can muster, let us remember and find comfort in the words of the psalm we have sung together this morning: The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom then shall I fear? One thing have I asked of the Lord; one thing I seek; * that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life; O tarry and await the Lord's pleasure; be strong, and God shall comfort your heart; * wait patiently for the Lord. Amen |
Mission
We believe God is calling us to cultivate a community of love, joy, hope, and healing. Jesus is our model for a life of faith, compassion, hospitality, and service. We strive to be affirming and accessible, welcoming and inclusive; we seek to promote reconciliation, exercise responsible stewardship, and embrace ancient traditions for modern lives.
Office HoursTuesday 9:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Thursday 9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. Friday 9:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. Closed holidays Our gardens and grounds are open from dawn to dusk for the community to pray, rest, be. Please help us take care of this sacred space by following the outdoor ethic & principle of “leave no trace.” |
Contact Information
|
Worship Times10 a.m. In-Person Worship & Livestreamed
View worship services. We would love to have you join us soon! |